18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Michelin Energy Saver +Premium
MichelinMichelin

Energy Saver +

R13 – R
VS
Continental UltraContact NXTPremium
ContinentalContinental

UltraContact NXT

9.5
R16 – R20
Also compare with
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 e.Ziex Turanza T005
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (92%) than Michelin (84%). The first tyre test of Michelin Energy Saver + was done in 2016, compared to 2025 when was the Continental UltraContact NXT first tested.

Test Profile

Michelin
Energy Saver +
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Number of tests
4
2
Best position
#5
#1
Average position
10.3
1.0
Latest test
2018
2025
Available sizes
—
23

Wet

Wet
Michelin Energy Saver +
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Wet handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin Energy Saver +
62%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%

Costs

Costs
Michelin Energy Saver +
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Rolling resistance
Michelin Energy Saver +
79%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%

Dry

Dry
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Dry handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Exterior noise
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%

Performance spider chart

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison