18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Michelin Primacy 5 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

Michelin
Energy Saver +
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Michelin
Primacy 5
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Number of tests
4
14
3
3
Best position
#5
#1
#1
#2
Average position
10.3
3.6
4.7
3.3
Latest test
2018
2025
2026
2026
Available sizes
188
126
40

Wet

Wet
Michelin Energy Saver +
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
58%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin Energy Saver +
62%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Michelin Primacy 5
51%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin Energy Saver +
95%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Wet handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%

Costs

Costs
Michelin Energy Saver +
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Michelin Primacy 5
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Mileage
Michelin Energy Saver +
94%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
28%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Rolling resistance
Michelin Energy Saver +
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Michelin Primacy 5
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Michelin Primacy 5
1%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Exterior noise
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%

Dry

Dry
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Michelin Primacy 5
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Dry handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Michelin Primacy 5
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison