Comparison: Michelin e.Primacy vs. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Premium

Michelin

e.Primacy

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

Pilot Sport 4 S

Test Profile

e.Primacy

P ZERO PZ4

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Number of tests

4

14

3

26

Best position

#3

#2

#1

Average position

12.0

5.5

3.3

2.2

Latest test

2025

2026

Available sizes

111

706

40

60

66

Wet

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Aquaplaning - cross

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Wet braking

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

95%

Continental PremiumContact 7

94%

Wet handling

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Wet circle cornering

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Hankook Ventus Evo

96%

Continental PremiumContact 7

92%

Dry

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Dry braking

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Dry handling

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

90%

Continental PremiumContact 7

85%

Dry steering response

Michelin e.Primacy

85%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Continental PremiumContact 7

96%

Dry lane changing

Michelin e.Primacy

93%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Continental PremiumContact 7

85%

Comfort

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Exterior noise

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

Continental PremiumContact 7

69%

Comfort

Michelin e.Primacy

54%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Costs

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Rolling resistance

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

59%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook Ventus Evo

86%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Mileage

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

49%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Continental PremiumContact 7

81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Michelin e.Primacy vs. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

e.Primacy

P ZERO PZ4

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison