Comparison: Michelin e.Primacy vs. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) vs. Hankook ION Evo

Premium

Michelin

e.Primacy

VS

Ecsta Sport (PS72)

ION Evo

9.0

R17 – R22

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

e.Primacy

Ecsta Sport (PS72)

ION Evo

Number of tests

4

3

1

Best position

#3

#1

Average position

12.0

4.0

1.0

Latest test

2025

2026

2025

Available sizes

111

54

64

Wet

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

69%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

75%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Wet braking

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

62%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Aquaplaning - cross

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

73%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Wet handling

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

69%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dry

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

71%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dry braking

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

69%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Dry handling

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

71%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Comfort

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

52%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Exterior noise

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

52%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Comfort

Michelin e.Primacy

54%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Costs

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

76%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Rolling resistance

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

76%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Michelin e.Primacy vs. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) vs. Hankook ION Evo

e.Primacy

Ecsta Sport (PS72)

ION Evo

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison