18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Michelin e.Primacy vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Michelin
e.Primacy
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
4
15
3
3
Best position
#3
#2
#2
#2
Average position
12.0
9.0
3.3
3.7
Latest test
2025
2025
2026
2025
Available sizes
111
225
60
34

Wet

Wet
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet braking
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
95%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet handling
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
96%
Falken e.Ziex
77%

Dry

Dry
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
83%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Hankook Ventus Evo
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Hankook Ventus Evo
73%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Michelin e.Primacy
54%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Costs

Costs
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
80%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
86%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison