18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Michelin e.Primacy vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

Michelin
e.Primacy
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
4
15
1
Best position
#3
#2
#1
Average position
12.0
9.0
1.0
Latest test
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
111
225
64

Wet

Wet
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet braking
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Wet handling
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Dry

Dry
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Dry handling
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Comfort
Michelin e.Primacy
54%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Hankook ION Evo
78%

Costs

Costs
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rolling resistance
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Mileage
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison