Comparison: Michelin e.Primacy vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental SportContact 7

Premium

Michelin

e.Primacy

VS

Also compare with

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 4 S

Test Profile

e.Primacy

Ventus Evo

e.Ziex

SportContact 7

Number of tests

4

3

15

Best position

#3

#2

#1

Average position

12.0

3.3

3.7

1.2

Latest test

2025

2026

2025

2026

Available sizes

111

60

34

122

Wet

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Continental SportContact 7

84%

Aquaplaning - cross

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Continental SportContact 7

66%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Continental SportContact 7

85%

Wet braking

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Hankook Ventus Evo

95%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Continental SportContact 7

95%

Wet handling

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Continental SportContact 7

89%

Wet side guide

Michelin e.Primacy

78%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Continental SportContact 7

80%

Wet circle cornering

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Hankook Ventus Evo

96%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Continental SportContact 7

86%

Dry

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Continental SportContact 7

91%

Dry braking

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Continental SportContact 7

97%

Dry handling

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Hankook Ventus Evo

90%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Continental SportContact 7

94%

Dry lane changing

Michelin e.Primacy

93%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Continental SportContact 7

86%

Dry steering response

Michelin e.Primacy

85%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Continental SportContact 7

85%

Comfort

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Continental SportContact 7

78%

Exterior noise

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Continental SportContact 7

75%

Comfort

Michelin e.Primacy

54%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Continental SportContact 7

80%

Costs

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Continental SportContact 7

79%

Rolling resistance

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

Hankook Ventus Evo

86%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Continental SportContact 7

79%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Michelin e.Primacy vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental SportContact 7

e.Primacy

Ventus Evo

e.Ziex

SportContact 7

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison