18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Michelin e.Primacy vs. Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Michelin
e.Primacy
Hankook
ION FlexClimate
Michelin
CrossClimate 2 SUV
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
4
1
2
3
Best position
#3
#1
#1
#2
Average position
12.0
1.0
1.5
3.7
Latest test
2025
2025
2024
2025
Available sizes
111
27
54
34

Wet

Wet
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
75%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet braking
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
70%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
81%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
95%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
86%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet handling
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
71%
Falken e.Ziex
69%

Dry

Dry
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
77%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
80%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
74%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
82%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
85%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Michelin e.Primacy
54%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
74%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
79%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Costs

Costs
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
85%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
85%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison