Comparison: Michelin e.Primacy vs. Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Premium

Michelin

e.Primacy

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

e.Primacy

ION FlexClimate

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Ventus Evo

UltraContact NXT

Number of tests

4

1

3

2

Best position

#3

#1

#2

#1

Average position

12.0

1.0

3.3

1.0

Latest test

2025

2026

2025

Available sizes

111

27

40

60

23

Wet

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Continental UltraContact NXT

56%

Aquaplaning - cross

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Continental UltraContact NXT

68%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

95%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

Continental UltraContact NXT

65%

Wet braking

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

95%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Wet handling

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Wet circle cornering

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Hankook Ventus Evo

96%

Continental UltraContact NXT

1%

Dry

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Dry braking

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Continental UltraContact NXT

63%

Dry handling

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

90%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Comfort

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

Continental UltraContact NXT

44%

Exterior noise

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

Continental UltraContact NXT

42%

Comfort

Michelin e.Primacy

54%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Costs

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Rolling resistance

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook Ventus Evo

86%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Michelin e.Primacy vs. Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

e.Primacy

ION FlexClimate

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Ventus Evo

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison