Comparison: Michelin e.Primacy vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Premium

Michelin

e.Primacy

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

Cinturato (C3)

Test Profile

e.Primacy

ION Evo

UltraContact NXT

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Number of tests

4

1

2

5

3

Best position

#3

#1

#2

Average position

12.0

1.0

2.2

3.3

Latest test

2025

2026

Available sizes

111

64

23

63

40

Wet

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Continental UltraContact NXT

56%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Aquaplaning - cross

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Continental UltraContact NXT

68%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

65%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Wet braking

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Wet handling

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Wet circle cornering

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Continental UltraContact NXT

1%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Dry

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Dry braking

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Continental UltraContact NXT

63%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Dry handling

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Comfort

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Continental UltraContact NXT

44%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Exterior noise

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Continental UltraContact NXT

42%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Comfort

Michelin e.Primacy

54%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Costs

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Rolling resistance

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Mileage

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Michelin e.Primacy vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Primacy

ION Evo

UltraContact NXT

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison