Comparison: Michelin e.Primacy vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Premium

Michelin

e.Primacy

VS

ION Evo

UltraContact NXT

9.5

R16 – R20

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Test Profile

e.Primacy

ION Evo

UltraContact NXT

Number of tests

4

1

2

Best position

#3

#1

Average position

12.0

1.0

Latest test

2025

Available sizes

111

64

23

Wet

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Continental UltraContact NXT

56%

Aquaplaning - cross

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Continental UltraContact NXT

68%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

65%

Wet braking

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Wet handling

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Wet circle cornering

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Continental UltraContact NXT

1%

Dry

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Dry braking

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Continental UltraContact NXT

63%

Dry handling

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Comfort

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Continental UltraContact NXT

44%

Exterior noise

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Continental UltraContact NXT

42%

Comfort

Michelin e.Primacy

54%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Costs

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Rolling resistance

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Michelin e.Primacy vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

e.Primacy

ION Evo

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison