Comparison: Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Premium

Michelin

e.Primacy

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

Pilot Sport 4 S

Test Profile

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

P ZERO PZ4

e.Ziex

PremiumContact 7

ION Evo

Number of tests

4

3

14

3

26

1

Best position

#3

#2

#1

Average position

12.0

3.3

5.5

3.7

2.2

1.0

Latest test

2025

2026

2025

2026

2025

Available sizes

111

40

706

34

66

64

Wet

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

83%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

76%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Wet braking

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

78%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Continental PremiumContact 7

94%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Aquaplaning - cross

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

68%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Wet handling

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

90%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Wet circle cornering

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

89%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Continental PremiumContact 7

92%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dry

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

77%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dry braking

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

80%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Dry handling

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

82%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Continental PremiumContact 7

85%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dry lane changing

Michelin e.Primacy

93%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

85%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Continental PremiumContact 7

85%

Dry steering response

Michelin e.Primacy

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

84%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Continental PremiumContact 7

96%

Comfort

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

75%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Exterior noise

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

77%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Continental PremiumContact 7

69%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Comfort

Michelin e.Primacy

54%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

74%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Costs

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

52%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Rolling resistance

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

59%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Mileage

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

49%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Continental PremiumContact 7

81%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Hankook ION Evo

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

P ZERO PZ4

e.Ziex

PremiumContact 7

ION Evo

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison