18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Number of tests
4
3
16
6
1
5
Best position
#3
#2
#3
#3
#1
#1
Average position
12.0
3.3
5.5
4.7
1.0
2.2
Latest test
2025
2026
2023
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
111
40
153
146
64
63

Wet

Wet
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Wet braking
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Wet handling
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%

Dry

Dry
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Dry braking
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Dry handling
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Exterior noise
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Comfort
Michelin e.Primacy
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%

Costs

Costs
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Rolling resistance
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Mileage
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison