Comparison: Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Premium

Michelin

e.Primacy

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Ecsta Sport (PS72)

Ventus Evo

Number of tests

4

3

Best position

#3

#2

#1

#2

Average position

12.0

3.3

3.7

4.0

3.3

Latest test

2025

2026

2025

2026

Available sizes

111

40

34

54

60

Wet

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

69%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Aquaplaning - cross

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

73%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

75%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

Wet braking

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

62%

Hankook Ventus Evo

95%

Wet handling

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

69%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Wet circle cornering

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

96%

Dry

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

71%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

Dry braking

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

69%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Dry handling

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

71%

Hankook Ventus Evo

90%

Dry lane changing

Michelin e.Primacy

93%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

75%

Comfort

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

52%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

Exterior noise

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

52%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

Comfort

Michelin e.Primacy

54%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Costs

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

76%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

Rolling resistance

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

76%

Hankook Ventus Evo

86%

Mileage

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Ecsta Sport (PS72)

Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison