Comparison: Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Premium

Michelin

e.Primacy

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

Cinturato (C3)

Test Profile

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

ION Evo

UltraContact NXT

Number of tests

4

3

1

2

Best position

#3

#2

#1

Average position

12.0

3.3

3.7

1.0

Latest test

2025

2026

2025

Available sizes

111

40

34

64

23

Wet

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Continental UltraContact NXT

56%

Aquaplaning - cross

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Continental UltraContact NXT

68%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

65%

Wet braking

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Wet handling

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Wet circle cornering

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Continental UltraContact NXT

1%

Wet side guide

Michelin e.Primacy

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Dry

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Dry braking

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Continental UltraContact NXT

63%

Dry handling

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Dry lane changing

Michelin e.Primacy

93%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Continental UltraContact NXT

100%

Dry steering response

Michelin e.Primacy

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Comfort

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Continental UltraContact NXT

44%

Exterior noise

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Continental UltraContact NXT

42%

Comfort

Michelin e.Primacy

54%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Costs

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Rolling resistance

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Mileage

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

ION Evo

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison