Comparison: Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Premium

Michelin

e.Primacy

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

WinterContact TS 870

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Number of tests

4

3

17

3

5

Best position

#3

#2

#1

#2

#1

Average position

12.0

3.3

1.7

3.7

2.2

Latest test

2025

2026

2025

Available sizes

111

40

80

34

63

Wet

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

87%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Wet braking

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

87%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Aquaplaning - cross

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

93%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

94%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Wet handling

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

92%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Wet circle cornering

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

94%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Dry

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

89%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Dry braking

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

86%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Dry handling

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

91%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Dry lane changing

Michelin e.Primacy

93%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

95%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Dry steering response

Michelin e.Primacy

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

90%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Comfort

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

90%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Exterior noise

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

86%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Comfort

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

85%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Costs

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

84%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Rolling resistance

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

89%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Mileage

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

83%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

WinterContact TS 870

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison