Comparison: Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Michelin Primacy 5 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Premium

Michelin

e.Primacy

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

e.Primacy

Efficient Grip Performance

Primacy 5

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

e.Ziex

Number of tests

4

16

3

1

3

Best position

#3

#1

#2

#1

#2

Average position

12.0

5.5

4.7

3.3

1.0

3.7

Latest test

2025

2023

2026

2025

Available sizes

111

153

126

40

64

34

Wet

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

81%

Michelin Primacy 5

58%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Wet braking

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

76%

Michelin Primacy 5

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Aquaplaning - cross

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

86%

Michelin Primacy 5

51%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet handling

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Wet circle cornering

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Dry

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

83%

Michelin Primacy 5

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry braking

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

83%

Michelin Primacy 5

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dry handling

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

93%

Michelin Primacy 5

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Comfort

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

77%

Michelin Primacy 5

1%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Comfort

Michelin e.Primacy

54%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

91%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Costs

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

73%

Michelin Primacy 5

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolling resistance

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

86%

Michelin Primacy 5

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Mileage

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

64%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Michelin Primacy 5 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

e.Primacy

Efficient Grip Performance

Primacy 5

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison