18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Continental EcoContact 6 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Continental
EcoContact 6
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
4
16
5
3
5
1
Best position
#3
#3
#7
#2
#1
#1
Average position
12.0
5.5
13.0
3.3
2.2
1.0
Latest test
2025
2023
2022
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
111
153
676
40
63
64

Wet

Wet
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Continental EcoContact 6
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Continental EcoContact 6
40%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Continental EcoContact 6
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet braking
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Continental EcoContact 6
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Wet handling
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Continental EcoContact 6
57%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Continental EcoContact 6
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Dry

Dry
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Continental EcoContact 6
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Continental EcoContact 6
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Dry handling
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Continental EcoContact 6
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Continental EcoContact 6
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Continental EcoContact 6
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Comfort
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Continental EcoContact 6
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%

Costs

Costs
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Continental EcoContact 6
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rolling resistance
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Continental EcoContact 6
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Fuel efficiency
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
88%
Continental EcoContact 6
99%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Mileage
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Continental EcoContact 6
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison