Comparison: Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Dunlop Winter vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Premium

Michelin

e.Primacy

VS

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

SportContact 7

WinterContact TS 870

Test Profile

e.Primacy

Efficient Grip Performance 2

WinterCraft WP52+

Winter

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Number of tests

4

18

3

2

3

5

Best position

#3

#1

#4

#1

#2

#1

Average position

12.0

6.1

4.3

1.5

3.7

2.2

Latest test

2025

2024

2025

Available sizes

111

47

97

65

34

63

Wet

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

79%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Aquaplaning - cross

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

66%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

69%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Dunlop Winter

71%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Wet braking

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

72%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Dunlop Winter

84%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Wet handling

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

86%

Dunlop Winter

67%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Wet circle cornering

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

Dunlop Winter

63%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Dry

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

Dunlop Winter

69%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Dry braking

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Dry handling

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Dunlop Winter

64%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Comfort

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Exterior noise

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Comfort

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

90%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

68%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Costs

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

91%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

71%

Dunlop Winter

83%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Rolling resistance

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

84%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

Dunlop Winter

81%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Mileage

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

100%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Dunlop Winter vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

e.Primacy

Efficient Grip Performance 2

WinterCraft WP52+

Winter

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison