18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
4
18
3
3
2
1
Best position
#3
#1
#2
#2
#1
#1
Average position
12.0
6.1
3.3
3.7
1.0
1.0
Latest test
2025
2024
2026
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
111
47
40
34
23
64

Wet

Wet
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet braking
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Wet handling
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Wet side guide
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Dry

Dry
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Dry handling
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry lane changing
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Dry steering response
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Comfort
Michelin e.Primacy
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Hankook ION Evo
78%

Costs

Costs
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rolling resistance
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Mileage
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison