18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Number of tests
4
18
6
3
1
26
Best position
#3
#1
#3
#2
#1
#1
Average position
12.0
6.1
4.7
3.3
1.0
2.2
Latest test
2025
2024
2026
2026
2025
2026
Available sizes
111
47
146
40
64
66

Wet

Wet
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Wet braking
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Wet handling
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%

Dry

Dry
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Dry braking
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Dry handling
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Dry lane changing
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Exterior noise
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
Comfort
Michelin e.Primacy
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%

Costs

Costs
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Rolling resistance
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Mileage
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison