Comparison: Michelin e.Primacy vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Hankook ION Evo

Premium

Michelin

e.Primacy

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 5

Test Profile

e.Primacy

Roadhawk

Efficientgrip Performance 2

UltraContact NXT

ION Evo

Number of tests

4

21

3

2

1

Best position

#3

#2

#1

Average position

12.0

11.9

3.3

1.0

Latest test

2025

2024

2026

2025

Available sizes

111

164

40

23

64

Wet

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

56%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Aquaplaning - cross

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Continental UltraContact NXT

68%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Firestone Roadhawk

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Continental UltraContact NXT

65%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Wet braking

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Firestone Roadhawk

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Wet handling

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Wet side guide

Michelin e.Primacy

78%

Firestone Roadhawk

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Wet circle cornering

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Continental UltraContact NXT

1%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dry

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Firestone Roadhawk

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dry braking

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Firestone Roadhawk

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

63%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Dry handling

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Firestone Roadhawk

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Comfort

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Continental UltraContact NXT

44%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Exterior noise

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Firestone Roadhawk

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Continental UltraContact NXT

42%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Comfort

Michelin e.Primacy

54%

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Costs

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Firestone Roadhawk

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Rolling resistance

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Mileage

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Firestone Roadhawk

64%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Michelin e.Primacy vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Hankook ION Evo

e.Primacy

Roadhawk

Efficientgrip Performance 2

UltraContact NXT

ION Evo

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison