18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Michelin e.Primacy vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Michelin
e.Primacy
Firestone
Roadhawk
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Number of tests
4
21
18
3
3
1
5
Best position
#3
#2
#1
#2
#2
#1
#1
Average position
12.0
11.9
6.1
3.7
3.3
1.0
2.2
Latest test
2025
2024
2024
2025
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
111
164
47
34
40
64
63

Wet

Wet
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Wet braking
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Wet handling
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Wet side guide
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%

Dry

Dry
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Dry braking
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Dry handling
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Exterior noise
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Comfort
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%

Costs

Costs
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Rolling resistance
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Mileage
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison