Comparison: Michelin e.Primacy vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

Premium

Michelin

e.Primacy

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

e.Primacy

Roadhawk

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Ventus Evo

P ZERO PZ4

Number of tests

4

21

3

14

Best position

#3

#2

Average position

12.0

11.9

3.7

3.3

5.5

Latest test

2025

2024

2025

2026

2025

Available sizes

111

164

34

40

60

706

Wet

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

83%

Aquaplaning - cross

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

68%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Firestone Roadhawk

79%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

76%

Wet braking

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Firestone Roadhawk

67%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

95%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

78%

Wet handling

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

90%

Wet side guide

Michelin e.Primacy

78%

Firestone Roadhawk

92%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Wet circle cornering

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Hankook Ventus Evo

96%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

89%

Dry

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Firestone Roadhawk

85%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

77%

Dry braking

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Firestone Roadhawk

83%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

80%

Dry handling

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Firestone Roadhawk

88%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

90%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

82%

Dry lane changing

Michelin e.Primacy

93%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

85%

Dry steering response

Michelin e.Primacy

85%

Firestone Roadhawk

100%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

84%

Comfort

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

75%

Exterior noise

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Firestone Roadhawk

62%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

77%

Comfort

Michelin e.Primacy

54%

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

74%

Costs

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Firestone Roadhawk

70%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

52%

Rolling resistance

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook Ventus Evo

86%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

59%

Mileage

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Firestone Roadhawk

64%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

49%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Michelin e.Primacy vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

e.Primacy

Roadhawk

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Ventus Evo

P ZERO PZ4

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison