Comparison: Michelin e.Primacy vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Hankook ION Evo

Premium

Michelin

e.Primacy

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 5

Test Profile

e.Primacy

Roadhawk

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

ION Evo

Number of tests

4

21

3

1

5

1

Best position

#3

#2

#1

Average position

12.0

11.9

3.7

3.3

1.0

2.2

1.0

Latest test

2025

2024

2025

2026

2025

Available sizes

111

164

34

40

64

63

64

Wet

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Aquaplaning - cross

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Firestone Roadhawk

79%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Wet braking

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Firestone Roadhawk

67%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Wet handling

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Wet circle cornering

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Dry

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Firestone Roadhawk

85%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dry braking

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Firestone Roadhawk

83%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Dry handling

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Firestone Roadhawk

88%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Comfort

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Exterior noise

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Firestone Roadhawk

62%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Comfort

Michelin e.Primacy

54%

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Costs

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Firestone Roadhawk

70%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Rolling resistance

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Mileage

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Firestone Roadhawk

64%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Michelin e.Primacy vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Hankook ION Evo

e.Primacy

Roadhawk

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

ION Evo

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison