18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Michelin e.Primacy vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Michelin
e.Primacy
Falken
e.Ziex
Kumho
Ecsta Sport (PS72)
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Number of tests
4
3
3
3
Best position
#3
#2
#1
#2
Average position
12.0
3.7
4.0
3.3
Latest test
2025
2025
2026
2026
Available sizes
111
34
54
60

Wet

Wet
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Wet braking
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
62%
Hankook Ventus Evo
95%
Wet handling
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%

Dry

Dry
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
83%
Dry braking
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Dry handling
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%
Dry lane changing
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
75%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
52%
Hankook Ventus Evo
75%
Exterior noise
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
52%
Hankook Ventus Evo
73%
Comfort
Michelin e.Primacy
54%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%

Costs

Costs
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
80%
Rolling resistance
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
86%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison