Comparison: Michelin e.Primacy vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Premium

Michelin

e.Primacy

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

e.Primacy

UltraContact NXT

P ZERO PZ4

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Ventus Evo

Number of tests

4

2

14

3

Best position

#3

#1

#2

Average position

12.0

1.0

5.5

3.3

Latest test

2025

2026

Available sizes

111

23

706

40

60

Wet

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Continental UltraContact NXT

56%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Aquaplaning - cross

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Continental UltraContact NXT

68%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Continental UltraContact NXT

65%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

Wet braking

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

95%

Wet handling

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Wet circle cornering

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Continental UltraContact NXT

1%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Hankook Ventus Evo

96%

Dry

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

Dry braking

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Continental UltraContact NXT

63%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Dry handling

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

90%

Dry steering response

Michelin e.Primacy

85%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Dry lane changing

Michelin e.Primacy

93%

Continental UltraContact NXT

100%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Comfort

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Continental UltraContact NXT

44%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

Exterior noise

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Continental UltraContact NXT

42%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

Comfort

Michelin e.Primacy

54%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Costs

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

Rolling resistance

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

59%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook Ventus Evo

86%

Mileage

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

49%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Michelin e.Primacy vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

e.Primacy

UltraContact NXT

P ZERO PZ4

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison