Comparison: Michelin e.Primacy vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Premium

Michelin

e.Primacy

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Test Profile

e.Primacy

UltraContact NXT

ION Evo

e.Ziex

Number of tests

4

2

1

3

Best position

#3

#1

#2

Average position

12.0

1.0

3.7

Latest test

2025

Available sizes

111

23

64

34

Wet

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Continental UltraContact NXT

56%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Aquaplaning - cross

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Continental UltraContact NXT

68%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Continental UltraContact NXT

65%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet braking

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Wet handling

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Wet circle cornering

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Continental UltraContact NXT

1%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Wet side guide

Michelin e.Primacy

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Dry

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry braking

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Continental UltraContact NXT

63%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dry handling

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Dry lane changing

Michelin e.Primacy

93%

Continental UltraContact NXT

100%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Dry steering response

Michelin e.Primacy

85%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Comfort

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Continental UltraContact NXT

44%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Continental UltraContact NXT

42%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Comfort

Michelin e.Primacy

54%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Costs

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolling resistance

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Michelin e.Primacy vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

e.Primacy

UltraContact NXT

ION Evo

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison