18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Michelin e.Primacy vs. Continental EcoContact 6 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Michelin
e.Primacy
Continental
EcoContact 6
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Hankook
ION Evo
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Number of tests
4
5
18
3
5
1
5
Best position
#3
#7
#1
#2
#1
#1
#1
Average position
12.0
13.0
6.1
3.3
2.2
1.0
2.2
Latest test
2025
2022
2024
2026
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
111
676
47
40
63
64
63

Wet

Wet
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Continental EcoContact 6
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Continental EcoContact 6
40%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Continental EcoContact 6
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet braking
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Continental EcoContact 6
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Wet handling
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Continental EcoContact 6
57%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Continental EcoContact 6
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Dry

Dry
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Continental EcoContact 6
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Dry braking
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Continental EcoContact 6
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Dry handling
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Continental EcoContact 6
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Continental EcoContact 6
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Exterior noise
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Continental EcoContact 6
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Comfort
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Continental EcoContact 6
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%

Costs

Costs
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Continental EcoContact 6
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Rolling resistance
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Continental EcoContact 6
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Mileage
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental EcoContact 6
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison