Comparison: Michelin e.Primacy vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Dunlop Winter vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

Premium

Michelin

e.Primacy

VS

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

SportContact 7

WinterContact TS 870

Test Profile

e.Primacy

Blizzak LM-005

Winter

e.Ziex

UltraGrip Performance 3

Number of tests

4

49

2

3

24

Best position

#3

#1

#2

#1

Average position

12.0

3.2

1.5

3.7

2.7

Latest test

2025

2024

2025

Available sizes

111

213

65

34

302

Wet

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

90%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

83%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

86%

Dunlop Winter

71%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

74%

Wet braking

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

95%

Dunlop Winter

84%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

80%

Aquaplaning - cross

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

84%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

74%

Wet handling

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

93%

Dunlop Winter

67%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

91%

Wet side guide

Michelin e.Primacy

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

100%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

100%

Wet circle cornering

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

90%

Dunlop Winter

63%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

86%

Dry

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

82%

Dunlop Winter

69%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

79%

Dry braking

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

81%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

72%

Dry handling

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

89%

Dunlop Winter

64%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

82%

Dry lane changing

Michelin e.Primacy

93%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

80%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

77%

Dry steering response

Michelin e.Primacy

85%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

84%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

79%

Comfort

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

81%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

85%

Exterior noise

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

79%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

80%

Comfort

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

82%

Dunlop Winter

87%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

73%

Costs

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

78%

Dunlop Winter

83%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

70%

Rolling resistance

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

87%

Dunlop Winter

81%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

75%

Mileage

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

64%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

56%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Michelin e.Primacy vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Dunlop Winter vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

e.Primacy

Blizzak LM-005

Winter

e.Ziex

UltraGrip Performance 3

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison