18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Michelin e.Primacy vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Michelin
e.Primacy
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
4
23
3
Best position
#3
#1
#2
Average position
12.0
6.7
3.7
Latest test
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
111
107
34

Wet

Wet
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
86%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet braking
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet handling
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Wet side guide
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
Falken e.Ziex
77%

Dry

Dry
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry lane changing
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Dry steering response
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
78%

Costs

Costs
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison