Segment
1. Michelin CrossClimate+ Premium2. Vredestein Quatrac Pro Premium
Comparison: Michelin CrossClimate+ vs. Vredestein Quatrac Pro
Table of contents:
| # | Michelin CrossClimate+
| Vredestein Quatrac Pro
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R19 | R17 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Today, we are comparing two all-around tyres: the Michelin CrossClimate+ and the Vredestein Quatrac Pro. Produced by Michelin and Vredestein respectively, these tyres are known for their high performance and versatility. However, there are notable differences between the two, as shown in a number of tests.
Michelin CrossClimate+
The Michelin CrossClimate+ scored an impressive 71% in our ratings. Excellent on dry handling and braking, this tyre particularly excels in snow handling and mileage. In the ADAC test, it ranked 3rd out of 7, and 2nd in the Autobild test amongst a field of 31 tyres. Its major strengths include Dry braking, Dry handling, Mileage, and Snow handling.
Vredestein Quatrac Pro
On the other hand, the Vredestein Quatrac Pro, manufactured in Hungary, scored 61% in our ratings. Quieter than its competitor, it's the tyre to choose if you value interior silence. However, the Quatrac Pro fell a bit short in handling and braking on dry surfaces and performed particularly poorly in snowy conditions. In the ADAC test, it took the 6th position out of 7, but performed better in the Autobild test with the 3rd position amongst 31 tyres. Some of the tyre's top features are Noise reduction, Snow traction, Wet braking, and Wet circle cornering.
Verdict
Overall, if you are looking for a high-performing tyre with strong mileage and excellent capabilities during dry and snowy conditions, choose the Michelin CrossClimate+. However, if noise reduction is your top priority and you mostly drive in wet conditions, the Vredestein Quatrac Pro might be the better choice. Keep in mind, however, that its overall performance falls below that of the CrossClimate+.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Vredestein Quatrac Pro Exemplary2. Michelin CrossClimate+ Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Vredestein Quatrac Pro Conditionally recommended2. Michelin CrossClimate+ Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow traction
Snow braking
Snow handling
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
3
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,0 | 2,6 | 3,0 | 2,4 | 2,7 | 0,6 | 1,5 |
| Michelin CrossClimate+ Rating: Sufficient | 2,7 | 2,6 | 3,9 | 2,4 | 3,0 | 0,6 | 2,0 |
| Vredestein Quatrac Pro Rating: Poor | 2,6 | 3,9 | 5,2 | 2,7 | 2,7 | 1,0 | 2,5 |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | |||
| Michelin CrossClimate+ Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | |||
| Vredestein Quatrac Pro Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2 | 1- | 2- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,5 | 46,3 | |||||
| Michelin CrossClimate+ | 39,9 | 48,6 | |||||
| Vredestein Quatrac Pro | 42,9 | 46,5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
