Comparison: Michelin CrossClimate+ vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Premium

Michelin

CrossClimate+

R13 – R19

VS

Upper-middle

Kumho

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

CrossClimate+

Ecsta HS52

e.Ziex

ION Evo

Number of tests

13

10

3

1

Best position

#1

#2

#1

Average position

4.1

6.0

3.7

1.0

Latest test

2021

2026

2025

Available sizes

85

104

34

64

Wet

Michelin CrossClimate+

81%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Wet handling

Michelin CrossClimate+

82%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Michelin CrossClimate+

73%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Wet braking

Michelin CrossClimate+

84%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Aquaplaning - cross

Michelin CrossClimate+

50%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Wet circle cornering

Michelin CrossClimate+

75%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dry

Michelin CrossClimate+

89%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dry braking

Michelin CrossClimate+

89%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Dry handling

Michelin CrossClimate+

89%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Snow

Michelin CrossClimate+

78%

Snow handling

Michelin CrossClimate+

81%

Snow traction

Michelin CrossClimate+

82%

Snow braking

Michelin CrossClimate+

77%

Comfort

Michelin CrossClimate+

79%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Exterior noise

Michelin CrossClimate+

78%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Comfort

Michelin CrossClimate+

87%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

Costs

Michelin CrossClimate+

86%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Rolling resistance

Michelin CrossClimate+

79%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Mileage

Michelin CrossClimate+

98%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Price/value

Michelin CrossClimate+

84%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

97%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Hankook ION Evo

60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Michelin CrossClimate+ vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

CrossClimate+

Ecsta HS52

e.Ziex

ION Evo

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Snow

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison