18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Michelin CrossClimate+ vs. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs. Kumho Solus HA31 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

When considering all-season tyres, two options that stand out among the rest are the Michelin CrossClimate+ and Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750. Both of these tyres offer excellent levels of performance and durability, but there are a few differences between them that could sway you towards one over the other.


Firstly, the Michelin CrossClimate+ is a reliable and efficient tyre, securing a second place position in both Autobild and Autoklub ÈR tests, and sixth place in the ACE tests. With a 71% rating on our website, it showcases superior comfort, excellent dry handling and efficient snow traction. Even though it's slightly pricey, it brings strong dry and snow handling, braking, and high mileage to justify its cost. Furthermore, it's praised for low exterior noise and reduced rolling resistance, enhancing its overall performance and comfort.


The biggest disadvantage of the CrossClimate+ comes from a noticeable vulnerability to curve aquaplaning, which slightly affects its wet handling capabilities. Overall, it's a worthwhile option if you value balance and durability, and don't mind paying extra for premium performance.


On the other hand, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 made its impression with an outstanding rating of 84%, being one of the top performers and securing a commendable fourth place in the Autobild test, while coming sixth and fifth in Autoklub ÈR and ACE tests respectively. Unlike its Michelin counterpart, the Kinergy 4S2 H750 impresses with its impressive wet handling capabilities, boasting excellent wet braking and good cornering properties. This tyre also stands out for its exceptional aquaplaning performance in both cross and longitudinal measurements, while demonstrating great dry handling and performance in the snow.


Yet, the Kinergy 4S2 H750 has one significant drawback, which is its mediocre mileage and somewhat satisfying comfort. Regardless, if you're after a budget-friendly all-season tyre that doesn't compromise on performance, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 shouldn't be overlooked.


In conclusion, both the Michelin CrossClimate+ and Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 have their respective strengths and weaknesses. If you prefer a tyre prioritizing dry performance, comfort, high mileage and don't mind premium pricing, go for the Michelin. If your main concern is wet handling and aquaplaning, and you're on a budget, the Hankook is the tyre for you. Ultimately, the best tyre will depend on your specific driving conditions and needs.

Test Profile

Michelin
CrossClimate+
Hankook
Kinergy 4S2 H750
Kumho
Solus HA31
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Number of tests
13
20
3
49
Best position
#1
#1
#8
#1
Average position
4.1
4.7
8.3
3.2
Latest test
2021
2025
2019
2024
Available sizes
85
135
82
213

Wet

Wet
Michelin CrossClimate+
81%
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
80%
Kumho Solus HA31
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Wet braking
Michelin CrossClimate+
84%
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
84%
Kumho Solus HA31
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
95%
Wet handling
Michelin CrossClimate+
82%
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
84%
Kumho Solus HA31
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
93%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin CrossClimate+
73%
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
85%
Kumho Solus HA31
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin CrossClimate+
50%
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
86%
Kumho Solus HA31
60%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin CrossClimate+
75%
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
84%
Kumho Solus HA31
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%

Dry

Dry
Michelin CrossClimate+
89%
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
86%
Kumho Solus HA31
56%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Dry handling
Michelin CrossClimate+
89%
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
85%
Kumho Solus HA31
53%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
Dry braking
Michelin CrossClimate+
89%
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
83%
Kumho Solus HA31
59%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Dry driving behavior
Michelin CrossClimate+
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
Dry steering response
Michelin CrossClimate+
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
Dry lane changing
Michelin CrossClimate+
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
80%

Snow

Snow
Michelin CrossClimate+
78%
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
82%
Kumho Solus HA31
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Snow traction
Michelin CrossClimate+
82%
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
78%
Kumho Solus HA31
60%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Snow braking
Michelin CrossClimate+
77%
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
85%
Kumho Solus HA31
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Snow handling
Michelin CrossClimate+
81%
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
85%
Kumho Solus HA31
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
72%
Snow cornering
Michelin CrossClimate+
75%
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
75%
Kumho Solus HA31
51%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
77%
Snow acceleration
Michelin CrossClimate+
97%
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
94%
Lateral guidance on snow
Michelin CrossClimate+
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
76%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin CrossClimate+
79%
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
88%
Kumho Solus HA31
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Exterior noise
Michelin CrossClimate+
78%
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
83%
Kumho Solus HA31
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
Comfort
Michelin CrossClimate+
87%
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
74%
Kumho Solus HA31
56%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Interior noise
Michelin CrossClimate+
82%
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
97%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
85%

Costs

Costs
Michelin CrossClimate+
86%
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
72%
Kumho Solus HA31
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Rolling resistance
Michelin CrossClimate+
79%
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
80%
Kumho Solus HA31
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
87%
Mileage
Michelin CrossClimate+
98%
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
59%
Kumho Solus HA31
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
64%
Price/value
Michelin CrossClimate+
84%
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
69%
Kumho Solus HA31
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison