18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Michelin CrossClimate+ vs. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs. Kumho Solus HA31

1 mutual test(s) with detailed data

When considering all-season tyres, two options that stand out among the rest are the Michelin CrossClimate+ and Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750. Both of these tyres offer excellent levels of performance and durability, but there are a few differences between them that could sway you towards one over the other.


Firstly, the Michelin CrossClimate+ is a reliable and efficient tyre, securing a second place position in both Autobild and Autoklub ÈR tests, and sixth place in the ACE tests. With a 71% rating on our website, it showcases superior comfort, excellent dry handling and efficient snow traction. Even though it's slightly pricey, it brings strong dry and snow handling, braking, and high mileage to justify its cost. Furthermore, it's praised for low exterior noise and reduced rolling resistance, enhancing its overall performance and comfort.


The biggest disadvantage of the CrossClimate+ comes from a noticeable vulnerability to curve aquaplaning, which slightly affects its wet handling capabilities. Overall, it's a worthwhile option if you value balance and durability, and don't mind paying extra for premium performance.


On the other hand, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 made its impression with an outstanding rating of 84%, being one of the top performers and securing a commendable fourth place in the Autobild test, while coming sixth and fifth in Autoklub ÈR and ACE tests respectively. Unlike its Michelin counterpart, the Kinergy 4S2 H750 impresses with its impressive wet handling capabilities, boasting excellent wet braking and good cornering properties. This tyre also stands out for its exceptional aquaplaning performance in both cross and longitudinal measurements, while demonstrating great dry handling and performance in the snow.


Yet, the Kinergy 4S2 H750 has one significant drawback, which is its mediocre mileage and somewhat satisfying comfort. Regardless, if you're after a budget-friendly all-season tyre that doesn't compromise on performance, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 shouldn't be overlooked.


In conclusion, both the Michelin CrossClimate+ and Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 have their respective strengths and weaknesses. If you prefer a tyre prioritizing dry performance, comfort, high mileage and don't mind premium pricing, go for the Michelin. If your main concern is wet handling and aquaplaning, and you're on a budget, the Hankook is the tyre for you. Ultimately, the best tyre will depend on your specific driving conditions and needs.

Test Profile

Michelin
CrossClimate+
Hankook
Kinergy 4S2 H750
Kumho
Solus HA31
Number of tests
13
20
3
Best position
#1
#1
#8
Average position
4.1
4.7
8.3
Latest test
2021
2025
2019
Available sizes
85
135
82

Performance comparison

Wet Performance
Michelin CrossClimate+
70%
Michelin
CrossClimate+
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
73%
Hankook
Kinergy 4S2 H750
Kumho Solus HA31
68%
Kumho
Solus HA31
Wet Braking
Michelin CrossClimate+
75%
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
60%
Kumho Solus HA31
67%
Wet Handling
Michelin CrossClimate+
86%
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
79%
Kumho Solus HA31
73%
Wet Circle Cornering
Michelin CrossClimate+
67%
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
75%
Kumho Solus HA31
67%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Michelin CrossClimate+
71%
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
81%
Kumho Solus HA31
71%
Aquaplaning Cross
Michelin CrossClimate+
51%
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
69%
Kumho Solus HA31
60%
Dry Performance
Michelin CrossClimate+
92%
Michelin
CrossClimate+
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
76%
Hankook
Kinergy 4S2 H750
Kumho Solus HA31
56%
Kumho
Solus HA31
Dry Braking
Michelin CrossClimate+
92%
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
75%
Kumho Solus HA31
59%
Dry Handling
Michelin CrossClimate+
92%
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
77%
Kumho Solus HA31
53%
Snow Performance
Michelin CrossClimate+
82%
Michelin
CrossClimate+
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
85%
Hankook
Kinergy 4S2 H750
Kumho Solus HA31
64%
Kumho
Solus HA31
Snow Braking
Michelin CrossClimate+
76%
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
86%
Kumho Solus HA31
76%
Snow Traction
Michelin CrossClimate+
87%
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
87%
Kumho Solus HA31
60%
Snow Handling
Michelin CrossClimate+
87%
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
87%
Kumho Solus HA31
69%
Snow Circle Cornering
Michelin CrossClimate+
78%
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
78%
Kumho Solus HA31
51%
Comfort & Noise
Michelin CrossClimate+
72%
Michelin
CrossClimate+
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
64%
Hankook
Kinergy 4S2 H750
Kumho Solus HA31
69%
Kumho
Solus HA31
Noise Exterior
Michelin CrossClimate+
61%
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
71%
Kumho Solus HA31
81%
Ride Comfort
Michelin CrossClimate+
82%
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
56%
Kumho Solus HA31
56%
Economy
Michelin CrossClimate+
90%
Michelin
CrossClimate+
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
70%
Hankook
Kinergy 4S2 H750
Kumho Solus HA31
74%
Kumho
Solus HA31
Rolling Resistance
Michelin CrossClimate+
79%
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
79%
Kumho Solus HA31
71%
Mileage
Michelin CrossClimate+
100%
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
61%
Kumho Solus HA31
77%

Tests used in comparison

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutobildAutobild
All season
2019225/45 R17View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison