18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Michelin CrossClimate+ vs. Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-2 vs. Kumho Solus HA31 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2


The Michelin CrossClimate+ and Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-2 are highly rated all-round tyres; that is, they are designed to navigate everything from harsh winters to hot summers. They were both put to the test by multiple professional reviewers, enabling a comparison of their strengths and weaknesses.


At Autoklub ČR, the Michelin CrossClimate+ ranked fourth out of nine tyres. It excelled in dry handling, dry handling-objective, comfort, wet handling, and wet braking. The Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-2, on the other hand, ranked third, beating the Michelin team in comfort, snow braking, snow handling, and snow traction. Hence, Goodyear's tyre seems to outshine Michelin's in snowy conditions according to this test.


In the similarly reputable ADAC test, Michelin ranked third and Goodyear second (out of seven contestants). Goodyear was praised for its performance on ice, being notably strong in both braking and lateral guidance. Michelin, despite not receiving a specific commendation, ranked strongly, implying its overall solid performance.


The differences were further underlined in the ACE test. Michelin stood out for its dry braking, dry handling, dry handling-objective, and exterior noise performance, achieving a sixth-place spot. Meanwhile, Goodyear fared better, ranking third. Its strengths lay in aquaplaning - cross, dry handling, dry handling - objective, and exterior noise.


In the most demanding Autobild test, where 27 tyres were tested, the Michelin CrossClimate+ took second place, while the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-2 had to settle for third. AutoMotorSport testers found the Goodyear tyre stronger, achieving second place, while Michelin took the third spot.


Verdict
The Michelin CrossClimate+ is, according to our rating, the superior tyre with a 71% rating compared to Goodyear's 65%. Testers' findings, however, suggest that the choice between these two could come down more to the specific conditions they will be used in - the Michelin tyre fares better in dry and wet testing conditions, while the Goodyear tyre shows its strengths in snowy and icy terrains.


It's worth noting that the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-2 has been replaced by the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3. Thus, you might want to check it out for potential improvements over its predecessor. The Michelin CrossClimate+ has not been replaced, suggesting its manufacturer, Michelin, believes it is still up to snuff in current market conditions. Goodyear's link here.

Test Profile

Michelin
CrossClimate+
Goodyear
Vector 4Seasons Gen-2
Kumho
Solus HA31
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Number of tests
13
20
3
23
Best position
#1
#1
#8
#1
Average position
4.1
2.4
8.3
6.7
Latest test
2021
2020
2019
2025
Available sizes
85
109
82
107

Wet

Wet
Michelin CrossClimate+
81%
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-2
88%
Kumho Solus HA31
69%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
Wet braking
Michelin CrossClimate+
84%
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-2
90%
Kumho Solus HA31
67%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Wet handling
Michelin CrossClimate+
82%
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-2
88%
Kumho Solus HA31
73%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin CrossClimate+
73%
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-2
84%
Kumho Solus HA31
71%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
86%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin CrossClimate+
50%
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-2
79%
Kumho Solus HA31
60%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
76%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin CrossClimate+
75%
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-2
88%
Kumho Solus HA31
67%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%

Dry

Dry
Michelin CrossClimate+
89%
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-2
76%
Kumho Solus HA31
56%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Dry braking
Michelin CrossClimate+
89%
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-2
67%
Kumho Solus HA31
59%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Dry handling
Michelin CrossClimate+
89%
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-2
80%
Kumho Solus HA31
53%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Dry driving behavior
Michelin CrossClimate+
76%
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-2
59%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%

Snow

Snow
Michelin CrossClimate+
78%
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-2
78%
Kumho Solus HA31
67%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Snow traction
Michelin CrossClimate+
82%
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-2
86%
Kumho Solus HA31
60%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
91%
Snow braking
Michelin CrossClimate+
77%
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-2
85%
Kumho Solus HA31
76%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Snow handling
Michelin CrossClimate+
81%
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-2
76%
Kumho Solus HA31
69%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
90%
Snow cornering
Michelin CrossClimate+
75%
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-2
69%
Kumho Solus HA31
51%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
89%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin CrossClimate+
79%
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-2
82%
Kumho Solus HA31
81%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
79%
Exterior noise
Michelin CrossClimate+
78%
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-2
86%
Kumho Solus HA31
81%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%
Comfort
Michelin CrossClimate+
87%
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-2
89%
Kumho Solus HA31
56%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
78%
Interior noise
Michelin CrossClimate+
82%
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-2
83%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%

Costs

Costs
Michelin CrossClimate+
86%
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-2
84%
Kumho Solus HA31
75%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
75%
Rolling resistance
Michelin CrossClimate+
79%
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-2
78%
Kumho Solus HA31
71%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Mileage
Michelin CrossClimate+
98%
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-2
88%
Kumho Solus HA31
77%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Price/value
Michelin CrossClimate+
84%
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-2
86%
Kumho Solus HA31
88%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
68%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison