Segment
1. Michelin CrossClimate 3 Premium2. Laufenn G Fit 4S Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from (Laufenn). Generally, Michelin allround tyres are slightly better rated (85%) than Laufenn (64%). In this particular case, the Michelin CrossClimate 3 has a better rating of 66% compared to 64% of the Laufenn G Fit 4S. The first tyre test of Michelin CrossClimate 3 was done in 2025, compared to 2021 when was the Laufenn G Fit 4S first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2025 225/40 R18 test, where both the CrossClimate 3 and the G Fit 4S were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Michelin CrossClimate 3 has B wet grip rating, whereas 50% of Laufenn G Fit 4S has C rating.
| # | Michelin CrossClimate 3
| Laufenn G Fit 4S
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R20 | R13 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin CrossClimate 3 Premium2. Laufenn G Fit 4S Lowcost
2. Laufenn G Fit 4S 14.8
1. Laufenn G Fit 4S Good
1. Laufenn G Fit 4S Good
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Winter | Wet | Dry | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | 1– | |||
| Michelin CrossClimate 3 Rating: Good | 1- | 2- | 2 | 1– | |||
| Laufenn G Fit 4S Rating: Good | 2 | 2+ | 2- | 2 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 38.0 | 43.9 | |||||
| Michelin CrossClimate 3 | 40.4 | 49.0 | |||||
| Laufenn G Fit 4S | 42.1 | 45.8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||