Segment
1. Michelin CrossClimate 3 Premium2. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 Premium
Comparison: Michelin CrossClimate 3 vs. Hankook Kinergy 4S2
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Michelin allround tyres are slightly better rated (85%) than Hankook (82%). In this particular case, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 has a better rating of 83% compared to 66% of the Michelin CrossClimate 3. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2025 225/40 R18 test, where both the CrossClimate 3 and the Kinergy 4S2 were tested.
| # | Michelin CrossClimate 3
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R20 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
2. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow braking
Snow cornering
Snow handling
Snow traction
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Price/value
Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Winter | Wet | Dry | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | 1– | |||
| Michelin CrossClimate 3 Rating: Good | 1- | 2- | 2 | 1– | |||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2+ | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
