Comparison: Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs. Firestone Multiseason 2

Summary: The Michelin CrossClimate 2 (our rating: 92%) and the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen‑3 (our rating: 81%) are two leading all‑season tyres with clearly different performance emphases. Across multiple independent tests (Autobild, ADAC, TyreReviews, Autoklub, ARBÖ and others) the CrossClimate 2 regularly places among the top candidates for snow and dry stopping, while the Vector 4Seasons Gen‑3 is frequently praised for wet handling, comfort and overall balance.

Neither model has been replaced by a newer generation (no “replaced by” model listed), so the test data refer to the current versions linked below:

• Michelin CrossClimate 2 — manufacturer: Michelin


• Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen‑3 — manufacturer: Goodyear

Test summary and comparative positions

Across the test pool the CrossClimate 2 most often ranks in the top positions (several 1st and top‑4 finishes in Autobild, Autoklub ČR, ARBÖ and TyreReviews) thanks to outstanding winter capabilities and short dry braking distances. The Vector 4Seasons Gen‑3 repeatedly scores highly for wet performance and comfort, taking top‑3 to top‑6 positions in the same comparisons and even test wins in selective reports (notably in some ADAC and Autobild rounds). Overall, in head‑to‑head comparisons the CrossClimate 2 tends to finish ahead when snow and dry braking are decisive; the Goodyear shines where wet grip and ride comfort are prioritized.

Michelin CrossClimate 2 — strengths & weaknesses

• Strengths: Best‑in‑class snow traction, excellent snow handling and snow braking, very short dry braking, low rolling resistance (fuel economy), good comfort and low wear in many tests.


• Weaknesses: Slightly limited wet braking/handling and modest aquaplaning margins reported in some tests. Higher price is frequently highlighted.


• Where it wins: Ideal for drivers who need a true winter‑capable all‑season with very good dry performance and low running costs.

Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen‑3 — strengths & weaknesses

• Strengths: Outstanding wet handling and short wet braking distances, very comfortable ride, well balanced across disciplines and generally low rolling resistance in many reports.


• Weaknesses: Longer dry braking distances versus the Michelin and slightly weaker snow traction in several comparative tests. Some tests noted higher exterior/road noise.


• Where it wins: Best for drivers who face frequent wet conditions and value comfort and predictable behaviour in rain.

Verdict — which to choose?

Overall winner for all‑round safety and winter capability: Michelin CrossClimate 2. If your priority is the strongest snow performance, top dry braking and low rolling resistance, the CrossClimate 2 generally outperforms the Goodyear in most head‑to‑head tests. Best choice for mixed winter climates and for buyers who prioritize stopping distances and fuel economy.
Best choice for wet roads and comfort: Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen‑3. The Vector 4Seasons Gen‑3 is extremely balanced, excels in wet grip and ride comfort, and is a strong candidate if you spend most driving time in rainy conditions or value a plush ride.

Choose based on your dominant driving conditions: snow/dry‑braking priority → CrossClimate 2; wet/comfort priority → Vector 4Seasons Gen‑3.