18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Pirelli P Zero Winter 2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P

Test Profile

Michelin
CrossClimate 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Pirelli
P Zero Winter 2
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Number of tests
24
4
2
29
Best position
#1
#2
#1
#1
Average position
2.7
3.3
2.0
3.7
Latest test
2025
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
151
40
48
180

Wet

Wet
Michelin CrossClimate 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
80%
Wet handling
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
82%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin CrossClimate 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
59%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Wet braking
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
13%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin CrossClimate 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Wet side guide
Michelin CrossClimate 2
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%

Snow

Snow
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Snow braking
Michelin CrossClimate 2
90%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
90%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
Snow traction
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Snow handling
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
67%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
65%
Snow cornering
Michelin CrossClimate 2
93%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Lateral guidance on snow
Michelin CrossClimate 2
100%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
66%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
87%

Dry

Dry
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
Dry handling
Michelin CrossClimate 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%
Dry braking
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
76%
Dry steering response
Michelin CrossClimate 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%
Dry lane changing
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
87%

Costs

Costs
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
74%
Rolling resistance
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
92%
Price/value
Michelin CrossClimate 2
43%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
49%
Mileage
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
51%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin CrossClimate 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
Exterior noise
Michelin CrossClimate 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
Comfort
Michelin CrossClimate 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
79%
Interior noise
Michelin CrossClimate 2
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%

Ice

Ice
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
23%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison