Comparison: Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Falken e.Ziex

Premium

Michelin

CrossClimate 2

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

Cinturato All Season SF3

Test Profile

CrossClimate 2

Efficientgrip Performance 2

UltraContact NXT

e.Ziex

Number of tests

24

3

2

3

Best position

#1

#2

#1

#2

Average position

2.7

3.3

1.0

3.7

Latest test

2025

2026

2025

Available sizes

151

40

23

34

Wet

Michelin CrossClimate 2

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

56%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Wet handling

Michelin CrossClimate 2

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Michelin CrossClimate 2

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Continental UltraContact NXT

65%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet braking

Michelin CrossClimate 2

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Aquaplaning - cross

Michelin CrossClimate 2

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Continental UltraContact NXT

68%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Wet circle cornering

Michelin CrossClimate 2

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Continental UltraContact NXT

1%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Wet side guide

Michelin CrossClimate 2

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Snow

Michelin CrossClimate 2

92%

Snow braking

Michelin CrossClimate 2

90%

Snow traction

Michelin CrossClimate 2

92%

Snow handling

Michelin CrossClimate 2

92%

Snow cornering

Michelin CrossClimate 2

93%

Dry

Michelin CrossClimate 2

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry handling

Michelin CrossClimate 2

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Dry braking

Michelin CrossClimate 2

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

63%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dry lane changing

Michelin CrossClimate 2

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Continental UltraContact NXT

100%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Dry steering response

Michelin CrossClimate 2

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Costs

Michelin CrossClimate 2

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolling resistance

Michelin CrossClimate 2

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Price/value

Michelin CrossClimate 2

43%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Mileage

Michelin CrossClimate 2

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Comfort

Michelin CrossClimate 2

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Continental UltraContact NXT

44%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Michelin CrossClimate 2

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Continental UltraContact NXT

42%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Comfort

Michelin CrossClimate 2

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Falken e.Ziex

CrossClimate 2

Efficientgrip Performance 2

UltraContact NXT

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Wet

Snow

Dry

Costs

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison