18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV vs. Laufenn G Fit 4S

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from (Laufenn). Generally, Michelin allround tyres are slightly better rated (85%) than Laufenn (64%). In this particular case, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV has a better rating of 89% compared to 64% of the Laufenn G Fit 4S. The first tyre test of Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV was done in 2023, compared to 2021 when was the Laufenn G Fit 4S first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV has B wet grip rating, whereas 50% of Laufenn G Fit 4S has C rating.

Test Profile

Michelin
CrossClimate 2 SUV
Laufenn
G Fit 4S
Number of tests
2
5
Best position
#1
#10
Average position
1.5
14.8
Latest test
2024
2025
Available sizes
54
4

Wet

Wet
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
75%
Laufenn G Fit 4S
81%
Wet handling
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
71%
Laufenn G Fit 4S
88%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
81%
Laufenn G Fit 4S
77%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
86%
Laufenn G Fit 4S
69%
Wet braking
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
70%
Laufenn G Fit 4S
84%

Snow

Snow
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
86%
Laufenn G Fit 4S
70%
Snow handling
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
81%
Laufenn G Fit 4S
57%
Snow traction
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
86%
Laufenn G Fit 4S
75%

Dry

Dry
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
77%
Laufenn G Fit 4S
72%
Dry braking
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
80%
Laufenn G Fit 4S
56%
Dry handling
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
74%
Laufenn G Fit 4S
88%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
82%
Laufenn G Fit 4S
51%

Costs

Costs
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
85%
Laufenn G Fit 4S
66%

Performance spider chart

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison