18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Michelin allround tyres are slightly better rated (85%) than Kumho (55%). In this particular case, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV has a better rating of 89% compared to 74% of the Kumho Ecsta HS52. The first tyre test of Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV was done in 2023, compared to 2022 when was the Kumho Ecsta HS52 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV has B wet grip rating, whereas 75% of Kumho Ecsta HS52 has A rating.

Test Profile

Michelin
CrossClimate 2 SUV
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Number of tests
2
10
Best position
#1
#2
Average position
1.5
6.0
Latest test
2024
2026
Available sizes
54
104

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison