Segment
1. Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV Premium2. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X H750A Premium
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Michelin allround tyres are slightly better rated (86%) than Hankook (77%). In this particular case, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV has a better rating of 94% compared to 88% of the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X H750A. The first tyre test of Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV was done in 2023, compared to 2021 when was the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X H750A first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2023 235/65 R17 test, where both the CrossClimate 2 SUV and the Kinergy 4S2 X H750A were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X H750A also have B wet ratings.
# | Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X H750A
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R17 - R20 | R18 - R18 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV Premium2. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X H750A Premium
1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X H750A Exemplary2. Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV Test winner
Name | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV Rating: Test winner | |||||||
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X H750A Rating: Exemplary | |||||||
Show test details |