18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV vs. Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. BFGoodrich Advantage

Test Profile

Michelin
CrossClimate 2 SUV
Hankook
ION FlexClimate
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Number of tests
2
1
14
Best position
#1
#1
#8
Average position
1.5
1.0
13.4
Latest test
2024
2025
2026
Available sizes
54
27
153

Wet

Wet
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
75%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
81%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
86%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
95%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Wet braking
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
70%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Wet handling
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
71%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%

Snow

Snow
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
86%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
75%

Dry

Dry
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
77%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Dry handling
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
74%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Dry braking
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
80%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
82%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Exterior noise
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
85%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%

Costs

Costs
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
85%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Rolling resistance
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
85%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison