18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Michelin
CrossClimate 2 SUV
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
2
1
3
Best position
#1
#1
#2
Average position
1.5
1.0
3.7
Latest test
2024
2025
2025
Available sizes
54
64
34

Wet

Wet
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
81%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
86%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet braking
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
70%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet handling
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
71%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%

Snow

Snow
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
86%

Dry

Dry
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
80%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
74%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
82%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
85%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
79%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Costs

Costs
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
85%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
85%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison