18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Michelin
CrossClimate 2 SUV
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Number of tests
2
14
3
Best position
#1
#8
#2
Average position
1.5
13.4
3.3
Latest test
2024
2026
2026
Available sizes
54
153
60

Wet

Wet
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Wet handling
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
86%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Wet braking
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
95%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
96%

Snow

Snow
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
86%

Dry

Dry
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
83%
Dry braking
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Dry handling
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
75%
Exterior noise
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
73%

Costs

Costs
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
80%
Rolling resistance
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Hankook Ventus Evo
86%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison