Comparison: Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Premium

Michelin

CrossClimate 2 SUV

VS

Also compare with

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 4 S

Test Profile

CrossClimate 2 SUV

Advantage

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Ventus Evo

Number of tests

2

14

3

Best position

#1

#8

#2

Average position

1.5

13.4

3.3

Latest test

2024

2026

Available sizes

54

153

40

60

Wet

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

75%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Wet braking

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

70%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

95%

Wet handling

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

71%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Aquaplaning - cross

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

81%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

86%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

Wet circle cornering

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

67%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Hankook Ventus Evo

96%

Snow

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

86%

Dry

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

77%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

Dry braking

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

80%

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Dry handling

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

74%

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

90%

Comfort

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

82%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

Comfort

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

79%

BFGoodrich Advantage

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Exterior noise

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

85%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

Costs

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

85%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

Rolling resistance

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

85%

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook Ventus Evo

86%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

CrossClimate 2 SUV

Advantage

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Wet

Snow

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison