18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Michelin Alpin A4 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Michelin
Alpin A4
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
5
3
3
Best position
#2
#4
#2
Average position
4.4
4.3
3.7
Latest test
2019
2025
2025
Available sizes
42
97
34

Wet

Wet
Michelin Alpin A4
83%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet handling
Michelin Alpin A4
91%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin Alpin A4
61%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin Alpin A4
72%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet braking
Michelin Alpin A4
91%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin Alpin A4
89%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%

Dry

Dry
Michelin Alpin A4
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Michelin Alpin A4
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
88%

Snow

Snow
Michelin Alpin A4
70%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin Alpin A4
72%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Michelin Alpin A4
59%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Costs

Costs
Michelin Alpin A4
86%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%

Ice

Ice
Michelin Alpin A4
84%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison