Comparison: Michelin Alpin A4 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Falken e.Ziex

Premium

Michelin

Alpin A4

R14 – R17

VS

Upper-middle

Kumho

WinterCraft WP52+

e.Ziex

9.0

R15 – R21

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

SportContact 7

WinterContact TS 870

Test Profile

Alpin A4

WinterCraft WP52+

e.Ziex

Number of tests

5

3

Best position

#2

#4

#2

Average position

4.4

4.3

3.7

Latest test

2019

2025

Available sizes

42

97

34

Wet

Michelin Alpin A4

83%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

79%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Wet handling

Michelin Alpin A4

91%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

86%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - cross

Michelin Alpin A4

61%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

66%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Michelin Alpin A4

72%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet braking

Michelin Alpin A4

91%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Wet circle cornering

Michelin Alpin A4

89%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Dry

Michelin Alpin A4

81%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry braking

Michelin Alpin A4

81%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Snow

Michelin Alpin A4

70%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

Comfort

Michelin Alpin A4

72%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Michelin Alpin A4

59%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Costs

Michelin Alpin A4

86%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

71%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Ice

Michelin Alpin A4

84%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Michelin Alpin A4 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Falken e.Ziex

Alpin A4

WinterCraft WP52+

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Snow

Comfort

Costs

Ice

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison