18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Michelin Alpin A4 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Michelin
Alpin A4
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Number of tests
5
3
1
5
Best position
#2
#2
#1
#1
Average position
4.4
3.7
1.0
2.2
Latest test
2019
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
42
34
64
63

Wet

Wet
Michelin Alpin A4
83%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin Alpin A4
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Wet handling
Michelin Alpin A4
91%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin Alpin A4
61%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin Alpin A4
72%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Wet braking
Michelin Alpin A4
91%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%

Dry

Dry
Michelin Alpin A4
81%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Dry braking
Michelin Alpin A4
81%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%

Snow

Snow
Michelin Alpin A4
70%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin Alpin A4
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Exterior noise
Michelin Alpin A4
59%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%

Costs

Costs
Michelin Alpin A4
86%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%

Ice

Ice
Michelin Alpin A4
84%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison